Showing posts with label writing exercises. Show all posts
Showing posts with label writing exercises. Show all posts

Wednesday, October 14, 2009

How to Say What You Mean and Mean What You Say - Word Choice for the Fussy Writer

Today, I'm posting the second workshop I taught at a recent writer's conference. This one on the writer's favorite friend - words. Here, we revisit our old buddies and learn to sharpen our writing without dulling our sensibilities. Enjoy!

In our first fiction workshop we talked about concepts involved in crafting a novel – deep POV and subtext – related to showing vs. telling.

In this works

hop we’ll be looking at the building blocks of all fiction – words.

Writing is a competitive industry. It’s difficult to break into, and difficult to stay in after you’ve been published.

One of the best ways to grab the attention of an agent or editor is to be interesting. That may seem obvious, but you might be surprised how many hopeful novelists forget this rule. Today, I’m going to take you beyond grammatical sentences, beyond correct phrasing, beyond simple words, into the realm of “attention grabbing interesting” through the use of word choice.

I said this morning that all writing concepts are really large ideas crammed full of the concepts that comprise them – we talked about bubbles inside of bubbles. This holds true with word choice. Two bubbles that are, if not one inside the other, are at least stuck together and over lapping are word choice and voice.

I’m not doing a workshop on voice today – but it’s important to understand word choice in fiction as being germane to your voice as a fiction writer and to your characters. The words you choose to tell you story need to be words that fit with the voice of the characters, the era, the setting, and above all, with your voice.

But let’s not get all in a ball about that today. I throw it out there as a kind of beacon – as you grow as a writer, find your voice and practice fearless word choice, you’ll develop into the kind of writer editors and agents say yes to.

Two pieces of advice about words: Continually add to your vocabulary. Bring words into your stable often. Not just words you know the definitions of and can pronounce correctly if need be, but words that expand your everyday language. Words you reach for when writing need to be words you reach for when speaking. Improving your vocabulary will improve your writing.

Trust your muse. An industry has been built around teaching people how to write. This has been helpful to many, but more often it has been confusing. The new writer is left quivering in the corner uncertain which error he has committee (but he is certain he has committed an error) that means certain death of his beloved story. We’re a bit tied up in knots when it comes to the rules of writing. In learning the rules we’ve become bound by them. My strong advice is to learn the rules so that you and your muse can successfully bend them, and, at times, even break them. There is a huge difference between a writer unintentionally breaking a rule and doing so with purpose. And the reader always knows the difference.

If that advice makes your insides do the happy dance, may I suggest a writing book that will really get your belly in a polka. Spunk & Bite: A Writer’s guide to punchier, more engaging language & style by Arthur Plotnik. It's a wonderful book that will help you get your writer's funk on.

There are nearly endless choices of focus for a workshop on word choice, but I’m focusing on my top three:

Verbs and adverbs

Word crutches

My second favorite Trope

The goal of this workshop is to free your mind, and hopefully your creative muse, enough to take some writerly risks when it comes to word choice. I’m hoping to take the lid off the jar – allowing us to have some creative fun.

Verbs and adverbs – We’ve heard all sorts of rules about verbs and adverbs in our writing journey. What are some of them?

Passive verbs

Adverbs are evil

Two iron clad rules; Verbs – make them strong. Adverbs –don’t use them.

The reasoning is sound – strong verbs convey greater meaning and do not require help from a descriptive adverb, and adverbs do little shore up weak verbs. They aren’t as helpful as we might like them to be.

First things first – let’s talk verbs. Two major issues with verbs are “passive verbs” and “weak verbs”. We’ll start with passive verbs.

Passive verbs: What are passive verbs? What are passive verbs? How can we identify them?

A trick to finding passive verbs in your work:

1. Take a highlighter to your work and underscore each use of the verb “to be”: am, are, is, was, were, will be, has been, have been, had been, etc.

2. When you find a “to be” verb in a sentence – look for the subject of the sentence. Often, weak verbs happen because the subject of the sentence is misplaced within the sentence, or is missing from the sentence. The subject of the sentence is the thing that performs the action. It is the person responsible for the verb.

An example of a sentence containing a misplaced subject: The child was bitten by the dog.

The passive verb “was bitten” is our red flag. Then we look for the subject of the sentence, which is, of course, the dog. The dog is the subject because the dog did the biting – not the child. The subject must appear before the verb. Placing the object in front of the verb renders weak verbs.

This seems simple, but it can get tricky fast. Let’s look at the sentence I just gave you, that I hope you jotted down – if you didn’t, jot it down now. “Placing the object in front of the verb renders weak verbs.” Where is the object of this sentence? The object is the word “object” because is the thing the verb is acting on.

Where is the subject?

The subject is missing. The subject has been omitted from the sentence. The correct sentence would read something like, “If you (the subject) place (the verb) the object (the object) in front of the verb (the indirect object), you (subject) render (verb) weak verbs (object).

So a second thing to look for when you’ve discovered a weak verb in your manuscript, is an AWOL subject.

Sometimes, when I am crafting a compound sentence I will write the simple sentence first, and then add in the complexities I want. This keeps me on the active verb straight and narrow.

I don’t intent to cut the ends off your creativity by insisting you format every sentence you write following every rule of grammar all the time. What I am suggesting is you master this rule of strong verbs, so that while you are crafting creative sentences you don’t risk losing your reader with passive verbs. Most of us have heard the saying, said tongue in cheek, “Mistakes were made”. The verb is passive, the subject is missing – but it’s funny precisely because it is a vague non-admission of guilt. You can see parents coming home after an evening at the opera, only to find the main floor trashed by their teenage son and his friends. The boy turns to his shocked parents and says, “Mistakes were made.”

It breaks the rules – but it does it on purpose and it works.

For those of you hard core learners - check out this link that talks about a specific system regarding passive/vague verbs:

Okay, that was a glance at passive verbs. Now we’ll look briefly at weak verbs – don’t panic – remember, I’m posting this workshop on my blog later. You’ll be able to read through it at your leisure. For now, we are getting our hands dirty, working with these concepts, which will help you when you revisit the workshop later. Okay! Weak verbs.

We can weed passive verbs out of our manuscripts and still be left with weak verbs. What makes a verb “weak”? I’ve done a fair amount of reading about weak verbs – and while there are technical answers rooted in grammar, for the writer, the answer can be distilled to this: weak verbs are general in nature, strong verbs are specific in nature.

Some examples:

The nurse hurried down the hall.

“hurried” is vague. It doesn’t help us picture the nurse as she moves down the hall. It isn’t technically incorrect – it isn’t “wrong” to say she hurried, but there are sharper verbs we could use. Verbs more specific to the manner in which the nurse hurried down the hall.

If I said “The nurse smashed down the hall” – it paints a brighter picture, both of the action and of the nurse. I’m picturing a wide set woman in whites, elephanting her way toward the double doors at the end of the hall. It adds specificity of action and character.

If I say, “The nurse trotted down the hall” – it conveys a less harried situation, she’s moving more quickly than walking, but it drains the sentence of tense, urgent movement. The specificity of the verb tells the reader how to feel about the scene.

When I post this workshop on my blog – I’ll include exercises for you to try. For the sake of time, we need to press on to the next verb related category:

Adverbs are words that describe the verb, they are easy to spot because they most often sport an –ly ending.

We’re told to expunge our work of –ly words. This is solid advice. For those of you who took this mornings fiction workshop, use of adverbs often translates into a form of “telling” rather than showing. In general, the overuse of adverbs is frowned upon in the industry.

I emphatically suggest you review your work and omit almost all –ly words from your manuscript. Strong verbs – which we’ve just talked about – do not require a descriptive – in fact, paring an adverb and strong verb weakens the verb. Editors often refer to this as “padding a sentence”.

Let’s revisit our nurse sentence with a strong verb:

The nurse lumbered down the hall.

The verb lumbered is strong – it’s visual, packed with meaning.

If I added an adverb: The nurse lumbered heavily down the hall – how important is the contribution of the adverb to the meaning of lumbered?

It isn’t. Lumbered carries within it the meaning “heavy” – the reader doesn’t need it underlined.

When you omit adverbs from your manuscript, you’ll often need to replace your verb with a strong verb – a verb that is specific in it’s meaning.

Remember: Strong verb = strong meaning.

However! While gunning for adverbs can be a writer’s sport, the rule against using them can feel confining. Some of us may feel it dampens our muse. Here is a trick taken from Art Plotnik’s Spunk & Bite which helps us make peace with our –ly friends.

“Take a forceful adjective, add –ly to make it an adverb, combine it with the target word, and voila!

The example in the book is this: the strong adjective: withering. Add an –ly. Combine it with a target word, say cute – and you’ve created a “burst of wry wit, a mini-statement. Witheringly cute.

Practice by choosing one or two of these strong adjectives and pairing it/them with a target word of your choice:

Lavish

obnoxious

scrawny

wounding

thundering

My examples: “Lavishly exclusive” “Obnoxiously kind” “Scrawnily intelligent” “Woundingly beautiful” “Thunderingly scant”

Omitting adverbs is a good rule, but don’t sacrifice your muse on the alter of correctness. Learn how to bend the rules to create memorable writing that works. Loosen up and have some fun sometimes. Adverbs, used sparingly and with expertise can add oomph and interest to your work.

Leaving the world of verbs – let’s talk about another bugaboo that plagues the pages of every writer’s novel:

Word crutches: Writers have words and phrases they use repeatedly – these are referred to as word crutches. In her article, Targeting Enemy Words, Sandra Miller defines crutch words as:

words that you fall back on when you can't find a better one--or when you are hoping to dilute the force of what you are really saying. Crutch words are especially likely to come out when you write about a subject that you fear will upset your readers. Every writer has different crutch words they rely on.”

Some of my crutch words are “bit” as is, 'she felt a bit suicidal', and I have a few weak verbs that are word crutches for me: “took”- when I edit my day’s writing, it’s not unusual for me to find my characters tooking all over the place. They took steps toward things, then took more steps away, they took things away, took things to heart, took control, took a break – blah blah blah – too much tooking. “Went” is another crutch word I expunge regularly – “she went to the sink, stripped and went to the backyard.” Too much wenting to be interesting reading.

Everyone’s crutch words will be different. If you do the work of cleaning up your manuscript by cutting passive verbs, replacing weak verbs and executing 99% of adverbs – it will be much easier to spot your crutch words – you won’t be wading through thick jungles of wordiness.

To find your crutch words read your manuscript and highlight words that appear frequently, especially in the same paragraph. Make a list of words that you use often. This will serve as a reminder as you’re writing, not to fall back on old friends, but to reach for clarity of meaning by using the appropriate word for the circumstance.

Repeating words stand out to a reader. I’ve read novels I loved, but found word crutches that stood out. In one YA fantasy novel I read recently the word “thrummed” appeared too often for comfort. It’s a stand out word, not often used in modern speech, so it’s use stood out. In another book I read by a favorite author, I couldn’t help notice the word “black” used over and over. Granted, it may have stood out more to me because use of the word black is used less often in recent years and the book I was reading was dated, but the author used the word a few too many times – and it became a word crutch.

Also look for phrases or actions that repeat too often. If you are writing a tear-jerker, for example, you may find yourself with characters who are constantly tearing up, shedding tears, choking back tears, spilling tears, jabbing at tears with a tissue, wiping away tears – see how repetitive it becomes?

Writer’s need to reach around the words, phrases, and verbs that sit at the front of our imaginative shelf. We need to reach for fresh, interesting words and phrases that tell the story and make the reader sigh with joy.

Discovering your word crutches can be eye opening, but it must be done – and it must be done for each manuscript you write. Just because the words: dangerous, never, and alarmed were crutch words in your last novel about a fairy from the underworld on a murderous spree in modern Chicago, doesn’t mean they will be crutch words in your new novel about an expatriate Russian princess turned arms dealer in the Cold War era. They might be the same, but I guarantee you’ll find new ones with each story you tell.

Speaking of fresh and interesting phrases – we’ve arrived at our last category -

Tropes: A literary trope is a common pattern, theme, motif in literature, or a figure of speech in which words are used in a sense different from their literal meaning.

Two popular tropes writers use are simile and metaphor – we’re going to touch on simile today. Originally, I’d thought I would teach on both simile and metaphor, but the as I prepared for this workshop, I realized I couldn’t do the metaphor justice in this format. It’s a workshop in and of itself – so I’ve settled on talking about my second favorite trope, the simile.

But first:

What is the difference between a simile and a metaphor?

Similes make explicit comparisons – home feels like paradise

Metaphor implies the comparison. – The place God forgot

Writers tend to use these two types of trope most often. Pretty straight forward stuff, in some ways, but again, the trick here is to be fresh and apt.

Similes are fun – second favorite or not, I love them and use them often in my writing. While writing we can reach for all sorts of comparisons and illustrations that sound savvy, funny, iconic, or what have you – but the question needs to be asked: does this simile play nice with the other concepts, characterizations, and themes in the book? Or does it stand out like a prom queen in army boots?

Obviously, I’ve just used a simile. What makes this simile work? What makes it apt?

It exemplifies the counterintuitive – this isn’t something we’d expect to see –

But, It’s specific, we can picture it. We can see a lovely girl thumping around the dance floor in clunky boots.

The prom queen simile works also because it highlights the problematic ways trope use could stand out – awkward, even ugly. The simile is tactile, sensory, slightly wry.

I’ve read similes like, “His smile was like the wind over the sands of the Sahara.” The sentence continued, explaining the trope: “vast and impersonal”.

The simile falls flat – it doesn’t work.

Here’s a hint – if you need to explain your simile or metaphor, you need a new simile or metaphor. If your simile requires you to defend why you put the two ideas side by side, then to two ideas don’t belong side by side. Look for a better simile. Although, I could have almost forgiven this author if his explanation of the simile was because the man’s smile was “gritty”, or “eroded”. Almost. But not quite.

Three questions to ask yourself when crafting tropes is to ask yourself:

Does this bring clarity?

Does this fit with and respect the rest of the novel in some way?

Would the scene be better without out it?

This is the rub for every writer – to be original and interesting without crossing over to the dark side of tropes where a manuscripts becomes padded with pithy phrasing and zippy similes. Clever trope isn’t a substitute for great writing filled with motion, meaning, and story. But when it’s right, – such as this one, found in Martin Amis’ Yellow Dog, “Her head dropped by degrees, like the resilient jolts of a second-hand” – when it’s right like that is, then your work sings.

I bid you good writing.

Monday, September 1, 2008

Welcome Guest Blogger - Janette Barber


Welcome Janette Barber to the blog - but before you do, you might want to fasten your seat belt, or whatever will hold you into your chair, because you are about to move FAST FORWARD into your writing. Janette is here to inspire, motivate and move you into finishing that fab piece of writing you've been ignoring. And you'll have a blast! Funny, smart, and accomplished are all words that describe Janette. Here's just a wee taste of who she is:

Janette Barber is the former 5 time Emmy Award winning supervising producer and head writer of The Rosie O’Donnell Show. She just received her 6th Emmy for her work as Hot Topics Writer on ABC’s The View. Janette produced and co-hosted her own show, Lighten Up, on the TV Food Network which featured ways to turn fattening favorites into healthier alternatives. Janette is the co-author of a best selling book, Breaking the Rules, Last Ditch Tactics for Landing the Man of Your Dreams (Career Press). Her newest book, released in June and also co-authored with Laura Banks, is Embracing Your Big Fat Ass (Atria). Janette has a blog that incorporates both writing and video. http://www.janettesblog.com/


What’s the deal with Writers’ Block?
By
Janette Barber

“Waiting for my muse…” is another way to say, “I’m a cashier.” The only thing that separates someone who wants to be a writer from someone who is a writer is that a writer writes. We don’t channel. We don’t have to tune our antennae to a cosmic force and wait for an alien to transmit. What a writer has to do is open up the typewriter (yes I know but I like the word) and write. Sit behind your keyboard. Put your hands on the keys and start moving your fingers. If you are a writer, something will come out. Maybe it won’t be what you want, or what you planned or even something you will ever use (as in publish) but once your fingers start moving your mind will too because you’re a writer. Once you remove the dam the water continues to flow. Just get started and you’ll have your script, story, novel.

I discovered this having once had a seven year writers’ block. And now I have 6 Emmy awards for TV writing and producing and a USA Today Best seller that I wrote with co-author, Laura Banks, in two weeks, in my spare time, while working 15 hour days on the staff of the Rosie O’Donnell Show in the early days following a fire at 30 Rock when our hours were longer and more stressful because we had a temporary office in a building under construction and were doing our show out of the Letterman studio. And yet I made every deadline….so what’s this about writers’ block?

The block happened many years ago. I was a new stand up comic when my first book came into my head. Literally in the dead of night. Bang. Right there. It was a murder mystery and the characters crowded into my head at around 1AM when I was trying to sleep. I was enthralled with them. I had a victim; I had characters that I loved. I got up and wrote them down. Then the next morning I sat down and kept writing. I wrote longhand in those days and it would just come faster than the pen and, at times, the plot took its own turns. I wrote seven chapters and then the murder finally happened. Now the detective needed to come. But, to my surprise, I didn’t know who the detective was. All the other characters had just come into my head. I had a dead body gasping it’s last in a townhouse on the Upper West Side and not a single detective, cop or even good Samaritan to solve it. So I put the chapters in a drawer.

Seven years passed. SEVEN YEARS! In all that time I kept thinking about my need for a detective but for SEVEN YEARS nothing was clicking. I was also, during this time, writing constantly on something else. I was a stand up comic and comics write their own acts so, essentially, all comics are writers. I went from the open mic and late night stage to the road very quickly. I became a road headliner and spent most of my time (about 40 weeks a year) out there working clubs. This meant a 45 minute set every night and two and sometimes three on weekends. I taped every show and listened to it and during the day worked on new jokes for the next night. Now and then I’d wonder who my detective was, but mostly I needed new jokes so I could get booked in more and better clubs and somehow achieve stardom or something…whatever…I didn’t even know. What I was certain of was that I had to write, pack and be on a plane to Albuquerque in four hours.

As I neared the end of the seven years even joke writing was getting harder and harder. Some days I didn’t do it, then lots of days I didn’t do it. I was just doing my same 45 minute act night after night. Days turned into weeks turned into months for nearly a year. Doing the SAME 45 minute set. I was weak from boredom but dry as a bone when it came to ideas. And my detective? Up his, was my attitude. Leaving me in the lurch for seven years! He could go ram it if he thought I needed him.

The pressure was mounting because I had a vituperative harpy screaming at me from inside my head, “You’ve got to write jokes to get anywhere and you have to be good. You have to be really, really good or people won’t hire you and then you’ll have no money and you won’t have the rent and then you’ll have to get a day job (rather die) or – move back to your father’s house?! (My response) Are you out of your F-ing mind?!?!?!?!? I can’t do that. So it boils down to having to write really, really good jokes cuz otherwise I’ll have to kill myself. What I had essentially done was turn each writing session into a life/death pressure cooker. What a surprise that I wasn’t writing. I judged every word I was writing by what I thought somebody else would think of it. Would the audience laugh and would the club owners and bookers see it as quality comedy? (“Who gives a crap about my detective,” I thought.)

Eventually I became aware of how much I was pressuring myself so I decided to try something. My New York apartment opened into a small entryway and long hallway. I had the entryway crammed with stuff all over the walls and I had a small table laden with things I had no where else to put. I took a kitchen chair, a red pen and a yellow legal pad, went and sat and wrote an incredibly detailed description of that corner. I did it because it was something I could be certain no one in the world would want to read. I was writing it to write it. It was for me and I didn’t have to judge it. It was sacrosanct. No one would (or ever has) read it. It was a description of a corner! But I sat there for three hours because I was writing and I wanted to and even though my corner would interest no one else, it did interest me. After 3 hours I had to get up to do the necessary. I walked down the hall. My desk was at the end of the hallway. Just as I reached my desk – it hit me. My detective. I stopped and sat down right then and started writing her. Moonbeam Tidwell was her name. She wanted to be a reference librarian but in the Tidwell family every male and every third daughter is a cop. Moonbeam was a Tidwell third daughter. Her roly-poly partner Cromwell Hicks followed her into my head. Then my jokes came back. The important thing for me to know was that “writers’ block” isn’t some outside force that stopped me from writing. It was simply me, scaring myself so badly with the need for perfection that I paralyzed myself.

The best piece of advice I ever got on the subject of writers’ block was from Patrick Kelly who was an award winning commercial director, utterly loved by that community, who has now passed. I had just done a Spic ‘N Span commercial with him. He had called me in to find out what I wanted to do with my career. That was what he was like – said he saw something in me and wanted to know what it was. I talked about wanting to write and how I was having “writers’ block” because instead of writing I kept doing other things. “That’s not writers block,” he said. “That’s writers’ avoidance. Whether you write or not is up to you.” I can’t give you better advice than that.

I went from seven years dry to being able to write under the pressure of a daily live TV show. You can’t not make your deadline in TV - the camera comes on at 10AM. It won’t wait for you. I’ve written two year long national magazine columns. You don’t get to tell your editor that your muse was napping. The deadline is 9AM on the 9th and that’s when you’ll deliver. I can always make any deadline because I know that writing is a choice and I can access my ideas whenever I want, on my schedule.

And, yes, by the way, I finished that mystery and it’s still in my drawer but, as you’ve seen, the water continued to flow. Trust is the most important quality you can cultivate. Trust in the process and trust in your own abilities. That and above all, a willingness to sit down, with discipline, and write.

******
I'm thinking about taking my show on the road! Anyone out there want to start making the comedy club rounds with me?? Wow! I'm inspired. No writer's avoidance! We are all now without excuse!

I bid you good writing

Friday, May 30, 2008

Writing Rules that Make Sense - Sort of

Quick tip for Writing Books: If you've been writing for awhile, you are beginning to have an idea of which areas you are strong in, and which areas you need to spend time perfecting. Look for specialized books in the area you need to work on (or the area you haven't researched yet). There are all kinds of style books out there (Thanks Strunk and White), but there are also books that focus on grammar, POV, characters, dialogue, etc. Don't buy them all! Just the one that covers in depth the aspect you need the most help with.
***


You should see my inbox. There are days I have to wade through reams of advertisements in order to find that e-mail from my agent I've been waiting for, or that note from a friend, or, even more fun, a fan!


It's not that I have a spam problem. It goes back to the days when I was starting out as a writer. I figured it was a good idea to sign up for a bunch of writing focused magazines, book clubs, contests, etc. I mean, I'm a writer, right? So I should have all sorts of writerly materials filling my inbox.


Daily, I am reminded of a contest site where I'm invited to enter my choice of 1,000,000,000 contests being run at THIS VERY SECOND. I'm told I qualify for a FREE BOOK, and that I have a CHANCE TO WIN a book by some author I've never heard of! Woo Hoo!


Well, I got to thinking.


I love it when that happens. Thinking. Makes me remember what my brain is for.


I got to thinking about how a writer should make the best use of all the opportunities to enter contests, do writing exercises, etc. Here are my thoughts on the subject:


Nearly every writing book you pick up will be jammed packed with writing exercises. Each one focusing on a specific aspect of writing. There are entire books dedicated to writing exercises, such as Brian Kiteley's book The 3 A.M. Epiphany: Uncommon Writing Exercises that Transform Your Fiction. I happen to own this book. I love the cover.


Then there are the contests. Oh my, oh my, there are contests. Contests where you are given the first sentence and you have to write the rest of the story, contests on specific topics, on specific genres, short story, poetry, inspirational, long story, poems about dogs; it's nearly endless.


So, should a writer be spending time doing writing exercises from a book? Entering contests?


Yes.


And no.


Here's what I say: Books like 3 A. M. are great because they force you through a sort of writer's mental gymnastics. They get you thinking out of your regular patterns and can help you to add dimension and depth to your writing. They are focused on specific aspects of writing, so you can work on areas you need the most help with. So, in a nutshell, they are fantastic.


But. . .


Well, lets talk about contests for a moment. If you ever land an agent, or a publisher, they are going to ask you if you have ever won a contest. It looks good to say you have won something for your writing. If the contest was a half decent one, a notation of your win may even grace the cover of your upcoming book. Add to that the fact that when you submit your work to a contest, you are submitting to much the same intellectual process as if it were to a publisher. Your entry needs to be properly formatted, and clean. It must be well written. It will be judged by a panel, it will be compared to the work of other authors. This is a good thing, especially if you are new to writing. It's a good way to get your feet wet.


But. . .


Here's the rub, as far as I'm concerned. Writing exercises and entering contests take a lot of time. Hours and hours of focused work go into preparing a manuscript for a contest (or, at least it should if you want to win). Writing exercises are set up for you, and you follow the format that is presented to you (in other words, you work on what someone else suggests you work on). This takes time away from your masterpiece; your book (or whatever it is you are writing that you desire to see published).


Okay, it is totally worth the time it takes to become a better writer, to get feedback on your writing and to improve your skill sets. You may want to consider blocking some of your weekly writing time for just such pursuits.


But. . .


Don't get distracted from your real goal: to finish your own work.


This past winter I opted out of all contests and writing exercises.


I wrote two books, and two short stories.


All of them are either published (the short stories), or being published (my books).


I took the time to focus what I had learned on my books, rather than spreading my time out on contests and exercises.


The take home lesson: Do what you need to do to become a great writer, beginning with making the best use of your time.


Peace.